CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF NEGATIVE AFFECTS MEASURING TOOLS

Authors

  • Baquandi Lutvi Yoseanto Universitas Indonesia Maju

Keywords:

negative affect, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling

Abstract

Negative affect is a general state of subjective stress and unpleasant conditions including anger, contempt, disgust, guilt, fear, and nervousness. This study aims to test the construct validity of the negative affect measurement tool. The approach in this study is a quantitative approach with a sample of 209 participants. Data collection was carried out by simple random sampling using a g-form questionnaire. The measuring instrument in this study was the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) questionnaire by Watson, Clark and Tellegen (1988) which was adapted by the Research and Measurement section of the Faculty of Psychology, Tarumanagara University. The analysis method used the CFA test using a structural equation model. The results of this study indicate that the CFA model is fit with the following details: Chi Square = 431.229 (p = 0.000), RMSEA = 0.076, GFI = 0.842, CFI = 0.916, and TLI = 0.901. The model modifications carried out were by eliminating 5 manifest variables and covariancing 13 pairs of error variables. The results of this study can be used for the wider community, especially companies or organizations that want to see the level of negative affect of employees so that preventive and corrective actions can be taken.

References

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–600.

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

Cochran, M.N. (2012). Counterproductive work behaviors, justice, and affect: a meta-analysis. University of Central Florida.

Humboldt, S. V., Monteiro, A., & Leal, I. (2017). Validation of the panas : a measure of positive and negative affect for use with cross-national older adults, Review of European Studies 9(2), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v9n2p10

McDonald, R.P. & Ho, M.H.R. 2002. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods 7 (1): 64–82.

Uyun, M. & Yoseanto, B.L. (2023). Seri Buku Psikologi Teknik Praktis Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Deepublish

Uyun, M., Eva, N., & Yoseanto, B.L. (2021). Confirmatory Factor Analysis untuk Penelitian Psikologi dengan Amos dan SmartPLS. Tangerang: PT Human Persona Indonesia.

Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6):1063-1070.

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18. https://doi.org/1-55938-938-9

Yoseanto, B.L., Zamralita & Idulfilastri, R.M. (2018). Afeksi negatif sebagai mediator antara keadilan organisasi dengan perilaku kerja kontraproduktif-organisasi. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 2 (2), 779-789.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-15

How to Cite

Baquandi Lutvi Yoseanto. (2025). CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF NEGATIVE AFFECTS MEASURING TOOLS. JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 3(01), 124–130. Retrieved from https://humasjournal.my.id/index.php/HJ/article/view/464